Reconfiguration blog

What goes around, comes around

It is sad to see what short memories people have of the failed SLHT (South London Healthcare NHS Trust).

Had the original proposition gone through, a rationalisation of the emergency departments of Lewisham Hospital and Queen Elizabeth Hospital Woolwich would have been inevitable and, with a similar pairing of Queen Mary’s Hospital Sidcup and the Princess Royal University Hospital, in Farnborough, a working model might have been achieved.

Instead, Queen Mary’s was destroyed by the removal of its emergency department and maternity services and some folk at Lewisham Hospital congratulated themselves on their lucky escape.

So, as an erstwhile consultant at Queen Mary’s, condemned to a second-class existence as all my acute colleagues disappeared from the site, with no continuing medical education opportunities available, and taking early retirement from the NHS as a result, it is with schadenfreude that I observe that the SLHT octopus has ensnared Lewisham at last.

There is nothing special about Lewisham that did not also apply to Queen Mary’s.

Even the finance directors of the four hospitals predicted, before SLHT was created, that the PFI (private finance initiative) burden was unsustainable — I was accused of scaremongering when I argued this at the time but was proved right. 

But looking at the figures I still conclude that, if the PFI debt was written off and future payments were covered in full, then all four hospitals could have survived unchanged and in financial balance.

So it appears that trust special administrator Matthew Kershaw, without prejudice, has come to the conclusion that I, and many of my Sidcup colleagues, reached five years ago. 

I congratulate him on his boldness but a nightmare could have been avoided had our concerns been taken seriously at the time.

When I started as a consultant in 1983, hospital managers were there to facilitate the plans devised by the clinicians. When I finished, in 2011, consultants were bullied threatened and coerced into following the plans devised by managers.

Financial balance has become the prime issue for hospitals and patient care must fit into the financial straitjacket. This is incompatible with maintaining clinical services.

There are economies of scale in large units, which is why we have superstores, and that is also why the concept of care in the community based around community hospitals is not financially sensible. Perhaps people with short memories should think back to the 1980s and ask why the extensive and clinically effective cottage hospital network was slowly closed.

If we are to make anything out of the catastrophe that is the SLHT, we should re-examine the purchaser-provider split that sets GPs against hospitals.

Turning Lewisham Hospital (and Queen Mary’s) into integrated care centres where GPs and specialists work together might restore my faith. If that is unaffordable, then they should close altogether. It might be better to have excellent services on two sites than substandard ones on four.

Of course that presupposes that there are enough beds in just two hospitals to cope with emergency demand in south London. Actually there aren’t enough with four. The health secretary should implement Mr Kershaw’s recommendations in full, and immediately. Other trusts face similar problems; SLHT is the first of many to come.

Andrew Bamji is an East Sussex consultant in rheumatology

Posted in:  Reconfiguration

Tags:  reconfiguration private finance initiative consultant secondary care

Comments

  • Dr H M Buckland

    5 February 2013

    Of course PFI was economic nonsense and we shall hear little more of it in the future.

    When evaluating government proposals carers must always bear in mind:-

    1) Managers are appointed to do the will of the treasury rather than to prioritise quality.
    2) Sick people are in no position to bargain.

  • Dr Robert Baxter

    5 February 2013

    All the SLHT merger did was to ensure that the problems created by the previous government in PFI costs and reduced payments for over-contract emergencies (as if hospitals can control the emergency flow...!) were rolled over to become an even greater financial headache for the next government. A lot of senior people felt that at the time, and we all have a "told you so" feeling now.

  • Dr.Gervase Hamilton,

    6 February 2013

    Andrew, I'm in complete agreement with your sensible and balanced observations on the run down of QMH and the effect of the fall out on the pattern of services for patients in South East London. You will no doubt recall the somewhat similar battles that took place in the 1990's over the amalgamation/rationalisation of services between Queen Mary's, the QE2 at Woolwich and the closure of The Brook and Greenwich District Hospitals at the time I was Diirector of Public Health in Greenwich. The same short-termism and concern with balancing the books was present then as it is now but now the whole issue has,as you rightly point out, been made infinitely more complicated by the ludicrous PFI debts piling up by the day and crippling the costs of running a service that should be flexible and responsive to patient needs.. Now the successful and well liked Lewisham Hospital is,like Queen Mary's,being held hostage to fortune and eviscerated merely to bail out the bankrupt SLHT.

    My main criticism is that our profession has not stood up as a unified whole to the dominance of NHS.managerialism .As a result we have made a rod for our own backs. Notwithstanding the fall-out from the Staffordshire enquiry,I doubt very much if the recent NHS reforms and the introduction of a GP led service will lead to any radical improvement to patient services or the health of the population of the deprived South London boroughs..The local GPs seem as disillusioned as the consultants. I don't blame you for retiring early-I did the same because I couldn't put up with constant change in the NHS and rule by managerial dictat .We all know that you've tried to keep the flag of good clinical care flying in QMH and ,indeed more widely inflying in SE London, but your going means one less doughty colleague to fight the good fight.
    Gervase.

  • Dr Peter Doyle

    9 February 2013

    Reading this does make me sad.
    It appears that my generation of doctors could be witnessing the ruination of the NHS.
    We could all get behind the NHS Action Party and try and influence the political scene?

  •  
  •  

Reconfiguration and integration

Reconfiguration and service integration are at the heart of the debate in to how to improve NHS services.

ArrowSee why